Very shortly into the video, watch Zina Garrison’s ‘side eye’ when this chick says that she was the “queen of Black-American tennis.”
Alright, I usually give people the benefit of the doubt, but not this wacky chick. At what point in history was there a ‘king’ or ‘queen’ of “Black-American tennis,” other than in this chick’s mind.
And when was there this “Black-American tennis?” And how do you play it?
If you read Black Tennis Pro’s on the regular, you will note that while I highlight Black tennis professionals, tennis is tennis. There is no White tennis, or Black tennis… it’s tennis. Now the distinction comes with the fact that we have players of a multitude of ethnic backgrounds. How that background has affected their participation in the sport of tennis is where I come in.
This interview on ESPN, under the guise of ‘Black History Month,’ clearly was seeking to get Zina Garrison to speak to her lawsuit against the USTA, and in doing so the lead in was about this “Black-American tennis.”
As an African-American learning to play tennis at a predominately White high school, I came to know and love the sport of tennis, not Black tennis – but tennis. A sport dominated by White players yes, but still… tennis.
Why are people who don’t know a damn thing about a sport allowed to conduct interviews as such?
Yet one more thing to make you go hmmmm?