Hey Wonder Woman %u2013 Since you compete in the Track and Field space you should understand there i...more
posted 03/04/11 at 12:08pm
on Tosh.0 - Put some effort into it next time
|
posted by Title IX Blog An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools. |
| Tweet |
|
There were a lot of issues/controversies raised by last week's story about a male high school wrestler who defaulted his match rather than wrestle a girl. Religion, violence, gender roles. Title IX was not one of them. Why? Because of the contact sport exception.
So I was surprised to read a blog post on the Chicago Tribune website Chicago Now entitled "The Unforeseen Consequences of Title IX" by Kirk Mango. Note that the title is pretty ubiquitous. Opponents of Title IX use it all the time to talk about a myriad of issues. But the post colon blog title "Top Iowa High School Wrestler Defaults, Won't Face Girl" was a little surprising. Because, again, Title IX does not require integration of teams when the sport is a contact sport. And as Joel Northrup pointed out when he issued a statement about his default to Cassy Hekelman, wrestling is a contact sport.
Girls have gained access to wrestling either because they have just been allowed to participate or because they have sought legal remediation under either an individual state's equal rights amendment or the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. For more on this I highly recommend Dr. Sarah Fields's book Female Gladiators: Gender, Law, and Contact Sport in America. She specifically addresses the legal and cultural controversies girls' wrestling has engendered.
So I hope Mr. Mango picks up Fields's book. As someone who in involved in promotion of youth sports (he has a website called Becoming a True Champion about empowering individual athletes) he should know what Title IX does and does not do. It does not require that girls wrestle boys--different laws do.
But no one seems to be writing pieces titled The Unforeseen Consequences of Equal Protection.
View Original Post at title-ix.blogspot.com | View EBuz's Full Profile
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by Women Undefined
07/31/10 at 10:26pm
posted by HoopFeed.com
03/03/11 at 8:49am
posted by MsAkiba
10/11/09 at 2:40pm
posted by Pretty Tough
03/03/11 at 11:22am
posted by MarQFPR
03/02/11 at 6:22am
posted by anngaff
02/23/11 at 12:16pm
posted by Pretty Tough
02/08/10 at 9:03pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball
03/03/11 at 1:39am
posted by Pretty Tough
03/01/11 at 1:30pm
posted by HoopFeed.com
02/11/11 at 12:10am
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by All White Kit
Today at 7:53pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 6:08pm
posted by The First Line
Today at 5:50pm
posted by Coach Dawn Writes
Today at 5:24pm
posted by The Track & Field Superblog
Today at 5:20pm
posted by Run Girl Run
Today at 5:16pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 5:09pm
posted by Inspiring Sports Women
Today at 3:41pm
posted by Fair Game News
Today at 3:27pm
posted by The First Line
Today at 3:02pm
There is 1 comment on this post. Join the discussion!
The original post has been corrected based on new infromation:
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/athletes-sports-experience/2011/02/unforeseen-consequences-of-title-ix-top-iowa-high-school-wrestler-defaults-wont-face-girl.html
Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 3:19pm EST