***FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE***
FEMALE CANOEIST TAKE OLYMPIC INEQUALITY TO COURT
CLAIMS LOCOG IS IN BREACH OF EQUALITY ACT 2010 Samantha Rippington (Left in photo), an elite female canoeist from Reading, will today launch a High Court challenge to the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG’s) refusal to carry out an equalities audit of the Olympic sports programme. Ms Rippington, who has on a number of occasions been selected to represent Great Britain at the canoeing World Championships, wants LOCOG to examine the gender bias in the Olympic sports programme, including the Olympic canoeing programme, which leaves out women’s canoeing events despite featuring a number of men’s canoe events.
Ms Rippington argues in her claim for judicial review that the Equality Act 2010 requires LOCOG to carry out an “equality impact assessment” of the Olympic sports programme, including canoeing. This, she argues, is necessary to demonstrate compliance with the public sector equality duty contained in section 149 of the Equality Act, according to which public authorities must, “in the exercise of [their] functions, have due regard to the need to… eliminate discrimination, advance equality of opportunity… [and] foster good relations between [women and men]…” She claims that LOCOG’s refusal to carry out the assessment, in a letter to her lawyers in April 2012, is in breach of section 149 of the Equality Act.
Prior to starting her legal action, Ms Rippington said,
“All I am asking is that LOCOG answer two simple questions: is it discriminatory for there to be five men’s Olympic canoe events but none for women?; and should that situation continue? As a female canoeist who could potentially compete at the Olympics I know what my answers are, but why won’t the people who are responsible for staging these Olympics give us their answers too? I think that the international bodies who decide the Olympic sports programme also need to bring themselves to address these simple questions. Olympic canoeing, both sprint and slalom, is very technical. It takes years to learn the techniques correctly and both the athletes and coaches require a lot of dedication. Not being an Olympic sport means lower levels of funding, support and training opportunities than the men, which makes progression, both individually and in terms of the sport itself, very difficult.“
Ms Rippington spoke from the Women Canoe Cup, an international women’s canoeing event in Boulogne Sur Mer, France, which is hosted as a focal point for elite and developing female canoeists who have no Olympic event in which to compete.
LOCOG claims that it does not have to comply with section 149 of the Equality Act because it is a ‘private entity not carrying out governmental functions’; because it does not control the content of the Olympic sports programme; and because the assessment would ‘serve no purpose,’ as it is not feasible at this stage to change the Olympic sports programme.
However, Marguerite Russell, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, London, who has been involved in representing Ms Rippington, said,
“Ms Rippington does not seek to use this claim to change the 2012 Olympic sports programme. She wants the organisers of these Olympics, who are in the UK bound by equalities rules, to conduct an in-depth examination of the gender bias in the canoeing programme, and, she hopes, in the Olympic sports programme in general. The Canadian courts have already decided that a national organising committee of the Olympic Games is carrying out a governmental function when it stages the Olympics. Ms Rippington just wants LOCOG to get on with conducting the equality impact assessment, as it is obliged to do, so that London’s Olympic legacy includes a positive contribution to the ongoing efforts to achieve equality of opportunity in the Olympic movement and in sport generally.”
Ms Rippington’s claim comes on the eve of the 2012 Games and in the year before the International Olympic Committee decides on the Olympic sports programme for the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janiero. The claim highlights broader issues of gender bias within the Olympic sports programme. Although at the 2009 IOC Executive Board meeting women’s boxing and a women’s kayak event was included in the 2012 Olympic sports programme, concerns remain as highlighted by the comments of Tessa Jowell as Olympics Minister in 2009, when she said that it was “wrong” that men could compete in many more events than women, and that it was “high time” there was equal opportunity at the Olympics.
Notes to editors:
Questions about this claim should be directed to Claire Thompson at firstname.lastname@example.org. Mobile: 07771 817015.
Garden Court Chambers switchboard is 020 7993 7600.
Useful media resources: http://www.wavespr.com/media-and-blogger-resources/samantha-rippington/
OFFICIAL STATEMENT – WomenCAN International:
“Sam Rippington is a courageous, thoughtful, intelligent and generous human being in addition to being a talented and committed athlete. Her simple questions highlight the fact that the Olympics are nowhere near equal for women. We hope that the questions she has posed will be given serious consideration by the IOC, the International Canoe Federation and the entire sporting community and that she receives adequate answers as soon as practicable. And we hope this can stimulate discussions about and actions to rectify systematic inequalities and imbalances throughout the Olympic sports program – summer and winter sports.
Sam has shown extraordinary determination, dedication and perseverance not only for her own personal development as an elite canoeist, but she continues to give back to the sport, coaching boys and girls and taking on leadership roles. We wish her all the best and wholeheartedly support her efforts on behalf of women around the world.”
For more information on women in Olympic Canoeing: www.womencanintl.com
Powered by Sidelines