ESPN, sadly, only has a vested interest in NCAA Softball, WNBA/NCAA, and then specialty stories (Fir...more
posted Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 9:19am PDT on Mark Wahlberg has his Tightie Whities in a Bunch
|
posted by Women's Sports Blog An irreverent look at the news, issues, and personalities of women's sports from a feminist perspective. |
|
|
|
|
Jon Wertheim, who wrote the SI cover story on Serena Williams as the greatest of all time, is being too generous to his colleague Bruce Jenkins and his unconvincing arguments to the contrary. Jenkins expresses undue confidence in the serve and volley game and the power of diverse strokes to defeat completeness from the baseline. His contention that Sampras at his peak would definitely beat Federer at his peak on grass is somewhat baseless (especially given the perfection of Federer's return game), and that carries over into his points about Serena. With Serena's win at Wimbledon last week, there remain only two challengers, Graf and Navratilova. Although both of them won more majors and spent more weeks at number one than Serena, the level of competition is significantly better now than it was in the '70s and '80s. Martina pioneered the very notion of weight training for female athletes, which put her way ahead of her peers. When Graf came up against a younger player of comparable skill, Seles, she lost. A lot. None of these women had to face a top five comprised of Henin, Clijsters, Sharapova, and her own sister. As Wertheim rightfully points out, the psychological challenge of the latter is a unique circumstance that probably prevented Serena from more career slams, although she seems to have conquered it. Although facing a wider variety of opposing styles would make match wins harder for Serena, I find it difficult, as does Wertheim, to imagine any given one-on-one match in which I wouldn't give her an edge. She's smart, she's incredibly strong, her technical skill is underrated (she's a top doubles player; she can play the net), and she's as mentally tough as anyone who's ever played the game. If matching the stats of players from less dominant eras is what counts, we should have to wait for her to measure up to Margaret Court's 24 slams, which Jenkins doesn't suggest. That seems to me a sign that most of his objections are disingenuous.
View Original Post at ftlouie.typepad.com/womensports
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by MsAkiba 10/11/09 at 11:40am
posted by AnnGaff 07/15/10 at 8:31am
posted by A Glam Slam 07/15/10 at 3:27pm
posted by WTA Women's Tennis 10/07/09 at 12:14pm
posted by AnnGaff 06/30/10 at 10:40pm
posted by Kelly Mazzante 07/13/10 at 1:09pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball 07/08/10 at 9:49am
posted by Pleasant Dreams - An Atlanta Dream Blog 03/07/10 at 9:24am
posted by Women Undefined 07/11/10 at 7:19pm
posted by HoopFeed.com 06/25/10 at 9:49am
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by A Glam Slam
Today at 4:31pm
posted by Dyla Magazine - Women's Action Sports Coalition
Today at 4:18pm
posted by Pretty Tough
Today at 3:54pm
posted by All White Kit
Today at 3:50pm
posted by The Glowing Edge
Today at 3:48pm
posted by Dyla Magazine - Women's Action Sports Coalition
Today at 3:46pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 2:37pm
posted by All White Kit
Today at 12:41pm
posted by Dyla Magazine - Women's Action Sports Coalition
Today at 12:40pm
posted by Just Kite It
Today at 10:49am
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!