I'm not a big Stanford fan, but at least they have a legitimate program and did it largely without t...more
posted 04/10/13 at 5:50pm
on Why Cal is my new favorite team
posted by Title IX Blog
Friday, December 7, 2012 at 6:11pm EST
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
There has not been much news around the addition of teams at the collegiate level of late. A few here and there, a mention of Title IX compliance.
The forthcoming additions of two women's teams at Central Michigan University is the same. Women's golf and lacrosse in two and three years, respectively.* The university has not added a women's team since 1998. Though nothing in the article explicitly states that CMU is adhering to compliance via prong two, history of expanding opportunities for women, that is the impression one gets from reading based on statements such as the following:
"As long as we are working toward equality, we are in compliance"--Judy Chandler, chair of Gender Equality Committee
“This is step one. We aren’t done yet.” --University President George Ross
What struck me about this story was the comment Chandler made after the above remark: "No one can stay in compliance every minute, because things are always changing."
This might be true if an institution is opting for prong one or prong three compliance. If following the latter, interests do change and student populations change. Of course it is the school's responsibility to be diligent in its monitoring of these changing interests. And things change in terms of proportionality as well. Undergraduate populations fluctuate in terms of size and gender breakdown and are not always predictable. But again, the university has an obligation to remedy discrepancies in a timely manner.
But prong two is another story. If CMU has not added a sport since 1998 but still contend that they are expanding opportunities for women's participation, well--they aren't. Or they weren't. That situation was not changing--unless they were systematically adding roster spots to existing women's teams. There was no mention of that practice.
It seems to me that there were a lot of minutes of non-compliance. It doesn't appear that the university was scrambling to add opportunities for ten years or so and just couldn't because of some constantly changing circumstances.
* Apparently eight sports were up for consideration and golf and lacrosse were chosen because they are "Michigan sports." Unfortunately, women's golf is not a recognized part of the MAC, the conference to which CMU belongs. It will have to find a difference conference affiliation for this sport, along with making contacts and contracts with local golf courses to use for practice and competition.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
Today on the Women's Sports Calendar:
| The Ultimate Fighter 17 Finale April 13: The Joint at Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas | FC Kansas City vs. Portland Thorns FC April 13: Shawnee Mission North High School Stadium |
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES & POSTS
April 6, 2013 at 4:00pm
November 28, 2009 at 5:06pm
March 30, 2013 at 11:32am
April 10, 2013 at 3:12am
March 30, 2013 at 11:15am
April 9, 2013 at 8:54am
March 20, 2013 at 10:46am
April 12, 2013 at 9:44pm
March 9, 2013 at 11:35am
April 11, 2013 at 8:59am
LATEST ARTICLES & POSTS
Fri at 9:44pm
Fri at 9:37pm
Fri at 9:12pm
Fri at 9:09pm
Fri at 9:01pm
Fri at 8:56pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!