Great article but really not true; there are many players involved in the NPF that are not from the ...more
posted 08/26/14 at 1:28pm
on Softball Standouts Plourde and Prezioso Represent Atlantic 10, Exemplify Mid-Major Potential at Next Level
posted by Title IX Blog
Monday, May 24, 2010 at 6:31pm EDT
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
Recently, the New York Times profiled the increasing popularity of flag football as a high school sport for girls, particularly in Florida. In trying to examine the controversial nature of the sport, the article managed to add controversy by sensationalizing the positions of some women's sports advocates and casting them as the mean, feminist foils to good wholesome fun.
Flag football for girls is controversial in Florida for the same reason competitive cheer is controversial. When schools count activities like cheer or flag football as athletic opportunities, it reduces resources and legal incentive to add other, more traditional athletic opportunities for girls, opportunities that would give girls who want it similar access to college or life-long play. Nobody is knocking flag football (or cheer for that matter) as a valid and valuable activity. There should be activities -- for boys and girls alike -- that have a less competitive, more "lighthearted" feel, as the article points out. Women' sports advocates are only questioning whether activities like these are truly a fair comparison to the serious, scholarship-potential athletic opportunities that already exist for boys.
In letter printed in yesterday's Times, the Women's Sports Foundation's Director of Advocacy, Nancy Hogshead-Makar, tries to set the record straight. I say "tries" because the paper edited her letter to obscure its main point: Hogshead-Makar doesn't object to flag football itself, but to the Florida High School Athletic Association's strategy of discouraging more traditional, competitive, (and perhaps tellingly, more expensive) sports for girls like crew, water polo, lacrosse, and archery by offering them easier, cheaper, but less comparable alternatives in the form of flag football (and cheer). The fact that the FHSAA is promoting flag football (as opposed to other emerging sports on NCAA's horizons) without putting in the work to support the sport's infrastructure -- governance and promotion outside of Florida's high schools -- further suggests that the association cares more about helping schools find a quick fix to major Title IX compliance problems than trying to truly equalize opportunities for Florida's girls.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
MORE ABOUT THIS AUTHOR:

An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination...
full profile
For more, visit EBuz's Full Profile
LATEST ARTICLES & POSTS
Thu at 1:53pm
Thu at 1:52pm
Thu at 1:48pm
Thu at 1:47pm
Wed at 12:52pm
Wed at 12:50pm
Wed at 12:17pm
Wed at 12:16pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!