This is a good first step by ESPN. I find myself to be frequently frustrated when I attempt to find...more
posted Saturday, October 16, 2010 at 11:10pm PDT on espnW: Finally, a brand for female athletes
|
posted by Title IX Blog An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools. |
|
|
|
|
A district court judge in Connecticut ruled last week granted class action status to a lawsuit filed by Quinnipiac volleyball players who are suing for a permanent injunction against Title IX violations that would result from the university's decision to terminate their team. The plaintiffs (the volleyball players) petitioned for a class action certification, which would allow them to represent:
a class of all present, prospective, and future female students who are harmed by and want to end [Quinnipiac University's] sex discrimination in: (1) the allocation of athletic participation opportunities; (2) the allocation of athletic financial assistance; and (3) the allocation of benefits provided to varsity athletes. They also file this action on behalf of females who are deterred from enrolling at [Quinnipiac] because of the sex discrimination in its athletic program, including its failure to offer the varsity sports in which they want to participate (despite [Quinnipiac's] failure to provide equal athletic participation opportunities to females).
To grant the plaintiff's motion to certify a class, the judge had to find that the class members were ascertainable (which is not the same as ascertained), too numerous to file as individual plaintiffs, must be similarly affected by the legal questions raised in the case, and that class members interests will be adequately represented by the named plaintiffs. Not surprisingly, the judge found that the Quinnipiac plaintiffs satisfied this standard.
Class actions are fairly common in Title IX cases. Cohen v. Brown was a class action, as was the female wrestlers' case against UC Davis and the female athletes' case against Slippery Rock (to name a couple). Class action posture helps ensure that the plaintiff's claims for prospective relief (such as a permanent injunction like the Quinnipiac players are seeking) doesn't become moot when the named plaintiffs graduate.
Next up in the Quinnipiac litigation is the bench trial, scheduled to begin on June 20.
The judge's order can be found at 2010 WL 2017773 (D. Conn. May 20, 2010)
View Original Post at title-ix.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by mhueter 10/04/10 at 8:54am
posted by Pretty Tough 02/17/09 at 10:57am
posted by HoopFeed.com 10/04/10 at 10:40am
posted by Women Undefined 07/31/10 at 7:26pm
posted by heather77 09/02/10 at 7:33pm
posted by WTA Women's Tennis 10/07/09 at 12:14pm
posted by MsAkiba 10/11/09 at 11:40am
posted by One Sport Voice 02/05/10 at 12:44pm
posted by Pat Griffin's LGBT Sport Blog 07/29/09 at 9:41am
posted by Musings from a Multisport Mama 10/27/09 at 9:16pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by All White Kit
Today at 11:12am
posted by Girls Riders Organization, Inc.
Today at 10:48am
posted by Left Coast Hoops
Today at 10:37am
posted by A Glam Slam
Sat at 3:07pm
posted by Pretty Tough
Sat at 3:02pm
posted by Wendy Parker's Extracurriculars
Sat at 2:55pm
posted by All White Kit
Sat at 2:22pm
posted by Byline to Finish Line
Sat at 1:53pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Sat at 1:52pm
posted by Loree: A Skirt, A Hammer, A Life, and A Dream
Sat at 1:43pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!