It sounds very subjective. I suppose the question then becomes who should evaluate, rate and rank t...more
posted 12/29/11 at 12:44pm
on Sharing the field: The conundrum of co-ed sports
posted by Title IX Blog
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 3:22pm EST
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
There were a lot of issues/controversies raised by last week's story about a male high school wrestler who defaulted his match rather than wrestle a girl. Religion, violence, gender roles. Title IX was not one of them. Why? Because of the contact sport exception.
So I was surprised to read a blog post on the Chicago Tribune website Chicago Now entitled "The Unforeseen Consequences of Title IX" by Kirk Mango. Note that the title is pretty ubiquitous. Opponents of Title IX use it all the time to talk about a myriad of issues. But the post colon blog title "Top Iowa High School Wrestler Defaults, Won't Face Girl" was a little surprising. Because, again, Title IX does not require integration of teams when the sport is a contact sport. And as Joel Northrup pointed out when he issued a statement about his default to Cassy Hekelman, wrestling is a contact sport.
Girls have gained access to wrestling either because they have just been allowed to participate or because they have sought legal remediation under either an individual state's equal rights amendment or the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. For more on this I highly recommend Dr. Sarah Fields's book Female Gladiators: Gender, Law, and Contact Sport in America. She specifically addresses the legal and cultural controversies girls' wrestling has engendered.
So I hope Mr. Mango picks up Fields's book. As someone who in involved in promotion of youth sports (he has a website called Becoming a True Champion about empowering individual athletes) he should know what Title IX does and does not do. It does not require that girls wrestle boys--different laws do.
But no one seems to be writing pieces titled The Unforeseen Consequences of Equal Protection.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES & POSTS
July 31, 2010 at 10:26pm
December 20, 2011 at 1:32am
December 27, 2011 at 10:15am
December 21, 2011 at 3:50am
November 26, 2011 at 1:47am
December 5, 2011 at 9:19am
December 3, 2011 at 9:18am
LATEST ARTICLES & POSTS
Thu at 1:54pm
Wed at 11:40pm
There is 1 comment on this post. Join the discussion!
The original post has been corrected based on new infromation:
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/athletes-sports-experience/2011/02/unforeseen-consequences-of-title-ix-top-iowa-high-school-wrestler-defaults-wont-face-girl.html
Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 3:19pm EST