Amazing Post. Wendy Parker is one of the few experienced professional sportswriters out there that ...more
posted 05/05/11 at 11:11am
on More thoughts on Title IX, football and proportionality
posted by Title IX Blog
Tuesday, May 3, 2011 at 12:16am EDT
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
| Tweet |
It's been a big news week generally and in Title IX land. We apologize for not keeping up.
Last week I kept meaning to write about how a Brown University committee was recommending the elimination of four sports from the varsity roster: wrestling, men's and women's fencing, and women's skiing. There was a list of eight criteria the committee followed when making the decision. Gender equity was listed as the eighth.
But then President Ruth Simmons announced (perhaps in light of seemingly immediate action to save the sports driven in large part by the wrestling program's alums from what I have read) that no decision will be made until fall semester.
But let's run the numbers anyway given that Brown was at the center, many years ago, of a very contentious and precedent-setting Title IX case. (It's always good to see if institutions remember their own history after all.)
Currently it appears (based on the latest data from the Department of Education) that women comprise 52 percent of the undergraduate student body and receive 46 percent of the athletic opportunities.
If the recommendations are enacted this is what changes (I am keeping the 52 percent the same while noting that undergraduate enrollment could change of course):
Not too much. Women would have 47 percent of the opportunities. But again, enrollment numbers and even roster numbers could change that figure slightly.
In other words, it's close, even though male athletes will receive the brunt of the cuts, the female student-athletes could have a case that they should not be cut because Brown has not achieved proportionality. Because while the 5% +/- figure has been thrown around when talking about how close to proportionality a school must be, there really is no magic number.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
| Tweet |
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by Women Undefined
07/31/10 at 10:26pm
posted by MarQFPR
04/29/11 at 11:30pm
posted by stephaniemp
05/01/11 at 7:25pm
posted by MsAkiba
10/11/09 at 2:40pm
posted by margiepritchard
05/02/11 at 5:32pm
posted by Swish Appeal
05/03/11 at 10:56pm
posted by All White Kit
05/02/11 at 10:40am
posted by anngaff
04/30/11 at 11:03am
posted by mhueter
05/03/11 at 1:19pm
posted by Women in Sport International
04/28/11 at 12:37am
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by Byline to Finish Line
Today at 10:01pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 1:20pm
posted by Jayda Evans: Womens Hoops Blog
Today at 1:20pm
posted by Loren Fogelman
Today at 12:55pm
posted by Title IX Blog
Today at 12:53pm
posted by Inspiring Sports Women
Today at 12:50pm
posted by NACWAA Blog: Inspiring Perspectives
Today at 11:56am
posted by WakeGirls Blog
Today at 11:53am
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Today at 11:46am
posted by The Track & Field Superblog
Today at 11:42am
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!