posted by One Sport Voice
Sunday, January 8, 2012 at 12:59am EST
Dr. Nicole M. LaVoi: This blog reflects my critical eye and voice on all things sport. I am a critical thinker, scholar, and researcher in girls & women in sport, youth sport, and coach & sport parent education.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
It is time to ban checking in boy’s and men’s hockey, not just raise the checking age, but get rid of it altogether.
I know this won’t be a popular idea. Raising the checking age in boys’ hockey hasn’t been popular either, but it is the right thing to do. Adversaries argue checking is fundamental to the game (read: the game, meaning men’s hockey which is the real hockey anyway). Big hits are exciting. Hockey isn’t hockey without checking. Taking checking out of hockey or raising the checking age makes it”wimpy”–code for: it will resemble women’s hockey, and feminizes males. (Read the USA Hockey column titled “Changing The Checking Age Does Not Soften Our Sport.” ). Males won’t want to play. It will put the USA at a competitive disadvantage. Nobody will pay for or watch hockey without checking… the counterarguments are many.
I play hockey. I am a hockey player in the largest women’s hockey league in the world (WHAM). I live in the State of Hockey (that is Minnesota for those who don’t know what I’m talking about). I am a hockey fan. I give hockey coach and sport parent workshops. I have researched psychosocial variables in hockey. I spent a good part of 2011 being part of discussions about concussions, and making a documentary on sport-related concussions. I get and understand the game of hockey.
If you know hockey, you know that checking is not allowed in women’s hockey. I favor that rule, even though I know many women want to have the opportunity to check, and at elite levels checking, er…I mean heavy body contact, does occur so why not make it legal. I have long thought checking should not be a part of any level or hockey, regardless of gender. If you make the argument that females shouldn’t check because it is dangerous, then why do we allow it in male hockey? Rather than argue that not letting females check is an outdated paternalistic rule, I’d rather argue another point. ( I will add however, that getting rid of checking for males, eliminates the idea that women’s hockey is “less than” or “not real hockey” because there is no checking, which could be a different blog).
KEY POINT: Are we less concerned with the health and well being of males? Do we feel it is OK to have males increase the likelihood of injury for our entertainment? Is putting males at increased risk for injury part of what it means to “be a man”?
I decided to write this blog because within a one week span here in Minnesota, two high school athletes have been severely injured as a result of checking. St. Croix Lutheran senior Jenna Privette suffered a serious spinal cord injury when she was checked from behind after taking shot and crashed into the boards. Jack Jablonski of Benilde-St. Margaret’s was paralyzed after he was legally checked into the boards. Would either of these injuries be prevented with a no checking rule or a much stronger stance on illegal checking from behind? I don’t know. What I do know is that FAR FEWER injuries would occur if checking were eliminated from male hockey, and through widespread educational efforts checking would be strongly discouraged and penalized in female hockey, and hockey in general.
Having the discussion is a worthy endeavor, regardless of if you agree with my premise or not.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
Filed Under:
View Original Post at nicolemlavoi.com
View Dr. Nicole M. LaVoi's Full Profile
There is 1 comment on this post. Join the discussion!
I think banning checking altogether is a bit of an over-reaction.
I grew up in the TC and have played hockey since grade school. I've followed the Jablonski story with great interest and concern because it does strike a cord. A HS teamate of mine went on to play at a prominent NCAA hockey power in the early 90's and delivered a boarding hit to a player which ultimately paralized him. It wasn't a cheap hit, but more of a freak accident and an awkward landing. Such things happen every so often in many contact sports (it happened just this season in fbs football, and there are other examples throughout the years in hockey, football, wrestling, and even pole vault, skiing, and gymnastics).
Checking IS a fundamental part of the game. However, I will concede that there are opportunities to better coach how to deliver contact.
When I was a lad in the 80's, my coaches taught checking as a method to rub someone out of the play, check the hands and stick, or use momentum to carry them out of the play. Too often now, however, I see guys standing up and purposely delivering crushing blows for no reason other than to lay someone out. Which, strategically speaking, makes no sense. If done properly, one can check someone out of the play but keep themselves in it. That is fundamental checking.
I think the larger problem is that checking isn't properly taught anymore. We used to do checking drills in practice in grade school and we were taught to keep the stick down and hit them off balance and get them off the puck, but keep ourselves in the flow of play.
Checking isn't going anywhere, much like we're not about to change football to two-hand-touch anytime soon. But awareness, coaching, and rule changes (such as stiffer penalties) can help prevent these tragic injuries (much like the NFL has taken an active role to help prevent concussion by stiffly penalizing helmet-to-helmet, hands to the head, etc. in an effort to change the culture of contact.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 9:39pm EST