Fantastic definitions though I must say that I associate these definitions more with "teamwork" than...more
posted 05/16/11 at 4:55pm
on My athletic nirvana smells like team spirit
posted by Alan's College Softball Blog
Thursday, May 12, 2011 at 12:24am EDT
Summarizes major developments in NCAA Division I women's softball, with a focus on the Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10, and SEC. My frequency of posting accelerates as the season progresses, from primarily on weekends during the season to live-blogging during the post-season as I watch games on TV.
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
| Tweet |
With the NCAA selections coming up Sunday night, a recent discussion thread on Ultimate College Softball reminded me of how the tournament seedings don't always match up with the media/coaches' poll rankings. I thus decided to make the following chart, which compares the past three years' final regular-season ESPN.com/USA Softball poll rankings (which I chose based on their nice archiving; see 2010, 2009, and 2008) and NCAA tournament seedings (2010, 2009, 2008). You can click on the chart to enlarge it.
As can be seen, I divided teams into three categories: comparably high in the poll rankings and NCAA seedings (+/- 1 of each other); seeded markedly higher than their poll rankings; and seeded markedly lower than their poll rankings. At the very top levels, the seedings and poll rankings tracked very well in 2008 and 2009, but much less so last year.
Though we obviously have a small sample, it seems that of the two, poll rankings may be a better indicator of likely tournament success than the seedings. Most notably, the 2008 Arizona State squad that won the Women's College World Series was ranked No. 2 in the poll, but only seeded sixth. That same year, Virginia Tech, which made a surprise appearance in the WCWS, had a poll ranking of 16th (potentially warranting a No. 16 seed), but was unseeded. Louisiana-Lafayette, another surprise 2008 WCWS participant, was ranked 17th, but unseeded.
Arizona, which made the final championship series last year against UCLA, had its finish better forecasted by its No. 6 poll ranking than its 10 seeding. The Wildcats were also seeded somewhat worse than their ranking in 2009.
One team, the University of Georgia, was seeded more favorably than its final regular-season poll position would warrant in all of the past three seasons.
Some have suggested that the RPI rankings, a computer-based system that takes into account teams' strength of schedule, have informed the NCAA seedings more strongly than the weekly polls (here supposedly are last year's RPI rankings).
I don't claim to know all that is going on. But, as you're watching the Selection Show, don't be surprised to see your favorite team seeded higher or lower than what you may have been expecting based on the polls!
Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!
| Tweet |
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by Women Undefined
07/31/10 at 10:26pm
posted by MarQFPR
05/16/11 at 12:55am
posted by Alan's College Softball Blog
05/12/11 at 12:24am
posted by They're Playing Basketball
05/12/11 at 12:11pm
posted by MsAkiba
10/11/09 at 2:40pm
posted by kristenbennett
04/11/11 at 1:08pm
posted by MarQFPR
10/18/10 at 2:38am
posted by Byline to Finish Line
04/12/11 at 5:38pm
posted by Alan's College Softball Blog
03/29/11 at 8:00pm
posted by Pretty Tough
02/08/10 at 9:03pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by Fast at Forty
Today at 2:20am
posted by All White Kit
Today at 2:16am
posted by C and R's Stanford Women's Basketball Blog
Today at 12:09am
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 12:05am
posted by Jayda Evans: Womens Hoops Blog
Mon at 10:46pm
posted by Fair Game News
Mon at 6:16pm
posted by Sports Girls Play
Mon at 5:07pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Mon at 4:52pm
posted by Pretty Tough
Mon at 4:51pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Mon at 4:48pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!