NO just because women do not dunk does not mean the rating for basketball is lower. it is because wo...more
posted Wednesday, October 20, 2010 at 2:19pm PDT on Lowering the Rim � Will that Really Help Women�s Basketball?
|
posted by Byline to Finish Line A chronicle of a sports reporter who ditched the sideline to discover her own power and strength by taking up endurance sports in her 30's. |
|
|
|
|
If Best Boyfriend Mark had been a female, he would have qualified for the Boston Marathon a long time ago. (Then again, that would have caused all sorts of issues for our relationship, but you understand the point.)
Instead, Mark needed to PR the marathon by about 20 minutes to make the cut for the most prestigious marathon in the world.
See, Boston Marathon qualifying times have a 30-minute differential for men and women.
And as registration for the 2011 Boston Marathon opens on Monday, a Wall Street Journal article posed the question that comes up nearly every year: Are qualifying standards too low for women?
Ask my friend Belinda, who took seven or eight tries to crack her female qualifying standards. From her standpoint, I’m sure the time was hard enough. It became her goal, her mission, her brass ring. She worked for it and earned it.
But if it had been five minutes lower, would she have been able to work to obtain that?
Some bloggers have taken offense to the tone and stats used in the Wall Street Journal article and they make some fair criticisms, particularly the news outlet’s reliance on marathon times for elite runners as opposed to the mass of age group runners and their characterization of women as more “social” runners who tend to run in a pack and hence, slower, which drags down the average time for female marathon finishers.
So, do the times need to be adjusted?
There is math supporting multiple arguments — from keeping the status quo to complete overhaul to five-minute tweaks.
I’m never really convinced by the math.
But here is what I’m wondering: Would changing the standards for women be a nod for women’s advancement in running? If you up the standard are you trying to subtly force women out of the Boston marathon by making it too hard or are you trying to acknowledge the vast improvements in women’s running and encourage continued growth?
Which offers greater opportunity?
Would faster times allow women to rise to the challenge? Or would it discourage them?
View Original Post at amymoritz.wordpress.com
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by All White Kit 10/18/10 at 3:37pm
posted by mhueter 10/04/10 at 8:54am
posted by Women Undefined 07/31/10 at 7:26pm
posted by Pretty Tough 02/17/09 at 10:57am
posted by Left Coast Hoops 10/17/10 at 10:37am
posted by Muslim Women in Sports 10/16/10 at 9:30am
posted by heather77 09/02/10 at 7:33pm
posted by anngaff 10/17/10 at 1:29pm
posted by From A Left Wing 09/14/09 at 2:46pm
posted by anyatukhus 12/13/09 at 3:24pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by Draft Day Suit
Today at 3:54pm
posted by Title IX Blog
Today at 3:42pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 3:32pm
posted by After Atalanta
Today at 3:25pm
posted by All White Kit
Today at 3:24pm
posted by My so-called FABULOUS life: Brianna Glenn
Today at 2:40pm
posted by Draft Day Suit
Today at 2:30pm
posted by The Track & Field Superblog
Today at 1:47pm
posted by HoopFeed.com
Today at 12:49pm
posted by RunLikeAGirl
Today at 12:36pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!