I feel your pain (literally)... or rather felt it. Advanced knee osteoarthritis had me quitting play...more
posted 01/18/11 at 3:53pm
on An athlete's life: Pain management
|
posted by Fair Game News Seeking equality on -- and off -- the field. The strong connection between organized athletics and power (political, economic, social) means sports have consequences far beyond the game. FairGameNews.com aims to challenge sex-stereotyped assumptions and practices that dominate sports -- and recognize that sports can be a tool for seeking equal treatment and fair play. |
|
|
|
|
By Laura Pappano
The debate is well underway about whether or not espnW is good or bad. Its just the sort of fun that – if Mike & Mike (heck, any sports talk guys) were to notice – might make for one of their classic on-air sets.
The back and forth might be mostly entertaining if it didn’t hit a familiar old scar in women’s sports: Should we run solo – or play with the boys?
The fear of being ghettoized into a splinter non-product is legitimate (especially if we have mix-ins of health and beauty tips). While I generally oppose segregating womens’ sports because – well – it’s like screaming “JUST MAKE US THE JUNIOR SPORTS VERSION!!” – I do see some reasons why espnW – though the concept rankles – may be a good thing. And the reasons have – alas – to do with the failure of most media to see the compelling product that is women’s sports.
– Coverage of women’s sports on TV is so horrendous right now, that there’s little risk of making matters worse (men’s sports make up 96.3% of airtime; women 1.6% and gender neutral topics 2.1%, according to the USC TV study)
– In media, staffing matters and if more bodies are being dedicated to covering women’s athletic events, some of that video/reportage will end up on ESPN and elsewhere. Content rules – the more you have, the more places it can go.
– The vague and shifting descriptions of espnW suggest that the concept is still being shaped. Few sports news outlets know very much about women sports consumers. This enterprise might enlighten them — and others. (Note to Sports Illustrated: Might be smart to offer the SI NFL shirt – free with subscription renewal – in sizes OTHER than L, XL, and XXL. It’s a pretty loud message that I’m not supposed to be reading).
– ESPN’s recognition that women comprise 24% of its audience should also be a wake-up call to women: We have power to exercise. We can do more than spur sales of pink NFL jerseys. We can tune in to women’s games, follow our favorite teams on the ticker, build fantasy leagues with female players…The possibilities are endless (if only there were someplace to watch).
The bottom line: We’ve just been told we matter. Let’s find a way to use that.
View Original Post at fairgamenews.com | View FGN's Full Profile
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by anngaff
04/18/10 at 7:25pm
posted by MsAkiba
10/11/09 at 2:40pm
posted by Women Undefined
07/31/10 at 10:26pm
posted by Draft Day Suit
01/10/11 at 6:47pm
posted by My so-called FABULOUS life: Brianna Glenn
01/12/11 at 4:53pm
posted by Stephanie Perleberg: Believe and Run On!
01/17/11 at 7:37pm
posted by After Atalanta
01/18/11 at 9:41am
posted by MarQFPR
01/10/11 at 2:16am
posted by WTA Women's Tennis
10/29/09 at 10:27pm
posted by Pretty Tough
01/15/11 at 2:45pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by A Glam Slam
Today at 1:31am
posted by HoopFeed.com
Today at 1:25am
posted by Left Coast Hoops
Today at 1:24am
posted by A Glam Slam
Tue at 9:00pm
posted by The First Line
Tue at 8:57pm
posted by Pretty Tough
Tue at 7:40pm
posted by Balanced Health and Nutrition
Tue at 5:34pm
posted by My so-called FABULOUS life: Brianna Glenn
Tue at 3:13pm
posted by Bike Diva
Tue at 2:58pm
posted by Chic Runner
Tue at 1:58pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!