Regarding the above event: You will notice that NSSA provides opportunities for Boys Shortboard, Gi...more
posted Monday, September 20, 2010 at 7:15pm PDT on NSSA SW Conference Open season kicks off at HB Pier
|
posted by After Atalanta A blog focused on issues of gender and sport. |
|
|
|
|
The Monday morning quarterbacking was all about the Patriots' second half demise yesterday. Nothing about the battle of the locker room bullies. (That I saw. If there was any kind of comment--please send me the link!!) Apparently I was the only one who saw the intrigue in having one team whose harassment of a female reporter made national news twenty years ago take on another team whose harassment of a female reporter made national news just last week.
I guess karma really isn't a bitch.
Anyway, that's not really what I want to be talking about.
I wanted to go back to the Erin Andrews/Ines Sainz comparisons made in the aftermath of Sainz's statements that she had been subject to inappropriate comments in the Jets locker room. The discourse was about whether Sainz was more self-sexualizing than Andrews. And I come down on the "it so doesn't matter"side of the debate. Why? Because our culture is doing a fantabulous job sexualizing these women all on its own.
Here was my highly refined sociological experiment: I googled each of them.
The results on the basic Google search include a series of thumbnail photos that one can click on for the larger version and original location.
The thumbnail photos are eerily similar. Both include shots of the respective reporters posed on bikinis. Both have shots in which the women's chests are clearly supposed to be the eye-catcher. And both searches contain respective ass shots: no heads; just backsides and both are from when these women were on the sidelines DOING THEIR JOBS. Most of the photos--outside of the bikini poses--were taken when Sainz and Andrews were working. So what if Erin Andrews is wearing a sweater that doesn't reveal as much skin as some of Sainz's tops?--the photos are focused in on the same body part. The intent is the same.
So let's stop with the whole "who's more pure" discussion and start looking at the purity level of the photographers, media outlets, and viewers.
View Original Post at afterata.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by Women Undefined 07/31/10 at 7:26pm
posted by Pretty Tough 09/20/10 at 1:40pm
posted by LHiggs 09/22/10 at 10:07am
posted by Pretty Tough 02/17/09 at 10:57am
posted by THE Phaidra Knight 09/19/10 at 11:30am
posted by MarQFPR 09/10/10 at 5:47pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball 09/18/10 at 11:31am
posted by anngaff 04/23/09 at 10:45pm
posted by Sports, Media & Society 09/18/10 at 1:28pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball 09/22/10 at 1:15pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by A Glam Slam
Today at 8:42am
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Today at 8:38am
posted by All White Kit
Today at 8:36am
posted by Pretty Strong
Today at 8:33am
posted by anngaff
Wed at 10:50pm
posted by WakeGirls.com's Vimeo Channel
Wed at 7:01pm
posted by SkaterGirl
Wed at 6:55pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Wed at 6:54pm
posted by Softball Performance Blog
Wed at 6:53pm
posted by Jayda Evans: Womens Hoops Blog
Wed at 6:36pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!