Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!

Today's New York Times includes an article on the competing proposals to the NCAA to recognize some version of competitive cheer as an emerging sport for women. One was submitted by a consortium of six universities already sponsoring varsity-level cheer, which they call "Acrobatics and Tumbling," while the other, called "Stunt" has been put forth by USA Cheer, an organization that has affiliation and common leadership with Varsity Brands Inc., the company that runs well-known competitions primarily for sideline cheer squads. According to the article,

The two proposals being considered by the N.C.A.A. share many similarities: the competitions themselves are longer and more standardized than in the past, athletes now wear uniforms more akin to those of volleyball players, and they no longer rally the crowd for another team.

However, they differ in other ways, like how to score the events and how many competitions to stage in any given season. The proposal being advanced by the handful of universities calls the new sport acrobatics and tumbling and uses a scoring system similar to that of gymnastics, with points based on degree of difficulty. The format backed by USA Cheer is called stunt and has a head-to-head format, with the competition divided into quarters.

One important distinction is the size of the teams. The proposal for acrobatics and tumbling, which was submitted to the N.C.A.A. late last year, imagines that an average squad size will number from 32 to 36 athletes, with a maximum of 12 scholarships. The proposal for stunt, which was sent in on Wednesday, envisions a squad of 20 to 30, with a maximum of 24 scholarships.

The article also addressed the potential Title IX implications of the NCAA's potential decision to award one or the other versions of competitive cheer emerging sport status. Athletic department administrators will now have another possibility to choose from in adding sports for women and to promote their institution's Title IX compliance by either satiating unmet interests and abilities or closing the disparity between athletic opportunities for men and women.

On the issue of competitive cheer's relationship to Title IX, reporter Katie Thomas admirably conveyed the position of mainstream women's sports advocates, which is that as long as competitive cheer is truly operating as a sport, with the same level of support, the same opportunities for varsity-level competition as any other sport, it ought to be considered a sport. This position is too nuanced for many reporters who seem to delight in setting up women's sports advocates the nemeses of competitive cheer, so I was pleased that this article conveyed a difference between being against competitive cheer, and being against/concerned about athletic departments using competitive cheer to avoid having to address existing disparities in traditional sports.

Support women's sports and SHARE this story with your friends!

• Cheer
• Sports
• More
• NCAA

This post is related to an ongoing story:

• Should Cheerleading be a Varsity Sport?

View Original Post at title-ix.blogspot.com

View EBuz's Full Profile

There is 1 comment on this post. Join the discussion!

MyeyeSeesall says:

Great job to katie thomas for writing a piece that pats women's advocacy leaders on the back for flipping their views and supporting the new form of competitive cheer at the college level. As anyone should have, their endorsement should only be for true genuine opportuntities in varsity athletics that are consistent with other varsity sports offered by universities. The only problem is that people like Nancy Hogshead Makar from the Women's Sports Foundation or Dr. Donna Lopiano of Sports Marketing Research, prominenet women's advocacy leaders, specifically chose to endorse the for profit backed version of cmopetitive cheer that is focused on participation by the very traditional sideline cheer teams that have always drawn their objections to being a genuine athletic opportunity and college sport. This preference was done with a clear knowledge of the group of NCAA member institutes who fully support "competitive cheer" as a varsity sport ad have created acrobatics and tumbling (National Collegiate Acrobatics and Tumbling Association's model) in the image of other NCAA sports. These are universities where the presidents and athletic directors have committed to sponsor and develop a new women's varisty sport unlike the cheerleading teams, which still cheer games, that are participating in the USA Cheer model.
The question at hand is why would these two organizations endorse a commercial affiliated entity over the organization that originally develop the sport and is actually backed by university presidents and athletic directors? Why would these leaders choose a group using the very cheer teams they have objected to being a sport over the group that has been providing true varsity athletic opportunities in line with Title IX. It seems the choice would be clear and somewhat predetermined given their position that these women's advocates would prefer the NCATA model whose team's have provided millions of dollars in scholarships to over 200 athletes as opposed to USA Cheer's STUNT which has not been competed in by one single true varsity team and none of those teams have provided one cent in scholarship dollars specifically for competing in STUNT.
I have no prestigious position or reputation that can lend credibility. But I do have a my sense of logic and reasoning. Just seems like a logical reason that NCAA member universities, their presidents and athletic directors are in a better position to know the NCAA and athletics than a cheerleading company. I endorse the NCATA and acrobatics and tumbling.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 3:06pm EDT

Leave Your Comment:  Read our comment policy

Login  |  Sign Up

LOGIN TO WOMEN TALK SPORTS:

Username: 

Password: 

SIGNUP FOR A WOMEN TALK SPORTS ACCOUNT:

A Women Talk Sports account allows you to maintain a profile at www.womentalksports.com and login to comment on posts using your WTS identity.

Fields marked with a * are required.

Your First Name*: 

Your Last Name*: 

Your E-mail*: 

Your Website: 

Your Location: 

Your Twitter Username: 

Create a WTS Username*: 

Create a Password*: 

Confirm Password*: 

Check here to receive bi-weekly emails from Women Talk Sports and partners highlighting discussions on our site and upcoming women's sporting events, as well as informing you of new products, services and special offers.

I accept the Terms & Conditions for joining Women Talk Sports